STRATEGY
REITs divesting assets:
Unlock tax-exempt financing while transferring operational risk and long-term mission alignment to a structured not-for-profit.
Managers seeking stability:
Lead a mission-driven portfolio with access to institutional capital and sustainable financing.
Developers seeking capital:
Access tax-exempt capital, lower cost of funds, and mission-aligned partners for expansion projects without shareholder return pressures.
Lenders and Investors
Support enterprises that balance social impact with financial discipline, with tax-exempt investment returns.
STRUCTURE
TRADITIONAL VS. NON-TRADITIONAL
Traditional Not-for-Profits (NFPs)
Typically, founded by religious and affinity-based organizations for the purpose of providing services to elderly people in their congregations. Predominantly Entrance Fee communities.
Non-traditional NFPs
Independent NFP entities founded by a developer, manager, accountant, or attorney, for the purpose of acquiring or developing senior housing. Predominantly rental communities.
What Is a Non-Traditional NFP financing?
A non-traditional NFP financing is a tax-exempt capital structure that combines mission-driven governance with institutional-grade financing, third-party operations, and lower-cost debt markets to enable senior housing properties to balance charitable impact with financial sustainability.
PROCESS
RESULTS
Ziegler connects institutional capital to Non-traditional NFPs, enabling growth with purpose.
Acquisition of Nine Communities
February 2026
North Carolina
$31,570,000
Bond Financing
Live Well Senior Living
January 2026
Vineland, New Jersey
New Community
$45,600,000
Acquisition Financing for an 82-Unit AL/MC Community
March 2024
Denison, Texas
$22,605,000
Bank/Bond Financing
|
Structure |
Private For-Profit Ownership |
REIT |
Traditional Not-for-Profit Obligated Group |
Non-Traditional Not-for-Profit |
| Ownership & Control | Individual, private equity, or family office owns PropCo and OpCo. Vertical integration of ancillaries for economies of scale. | REIT owns property (PropCo); An independent Operating Company (OpCo) pays rent to PropCo. | Community-based board; all campuses mission aligned. | Mission-driven foundation or hybrid nonprofit; may include health system or charitable trust. |
| Objective | Maximize cash flow, optimize value for sale/refinancing, grow market share | Maximize stable returns for shareholders, grow portfolio diversification, maintain asset value. | Advance resident wellbeing, long-term community stability, fulfill charitable mission | Expand access, innovate care delivery, demonstrate social value, address affordability gap |
| Capital & Profits | Owner-driven; profits distributed to principals/investors. GP/LP cash flow hurdles and waterfalls. | Investor-driven; profits/shareholder returns | Surplus reinvested; community/mission focus | Surplus reinvested; mission-driven, may include innovative/affordable care focus |
| Debt Liability | Owner bears financial risk (recourse). Potential to finance AL/MC/SNF through HUD, eliminate recourse. | PropCo (REIT) isolated from OpCo operational risk | Joint and several across obligated entities. Non-recourse debt. | Joint and several or structured with liquidity support; may use tax-exempt bonds |
| Third-Party Economics | Base and incentive management fees for third-party manager. Potential for ownership to bring third-party management services, and ancillary services in-house. | Base and incentive management fees for third-party manager. May include purchase/fixed lease or RIDEA profit-sharing structures | Rare to use third-party; when present, focus is on alignment with mission/surplus retention and regulatory compliance; may be fee-for-service or cooperative contract | Potential for third-parties to generate revenue from management fees, asset management fees, development fees, and subordinate debt investments |
| Management Alignment | In-house or Third-party contract management; focus on NOI/returns | OpCo or Third-party contract manager; economic alignment via management fees | Mission driven. Typically in-house. third-party manager, less common. | Typically third-party contract manager. In-house rare. |
| Asset Manager Role | Maximizes returns, manages financial and operational risk, capital improvement, market positioning | Oversees financial performance, operator alignment, benchmarking, compliance, and portfolio strategy | Ensures mission focus, compliance, capital sustainability, reinvestment, and board reporting | Oversees mission alignment, capital deployment, compliance, and strategic growth; coordinates with bond investors and development teams |
| Investment Horizon | Mid- to long-term (3–10+ years, depending on sponsor and strategy) | Long-term (often 10+ years for REITs) | Long-term (aligned with mission and community sustainability) | Long-term (aligned with mission, capital deployment, and bond maturity) |
- Identify an established Senior Living Not-for-profit; OR
- Form a new 501c3 Not-for-profit (2-6 month process)
- Acquisitions: AL, MC, SNF eligible (IL taxable only)
- Expansions: IL, AL, MC, SNF eligible
- Eligible Fees: Management & Development Fees, Sub debt returns
- Debt Service Coverage: min 1.30x senior, min 1.20x subordinate
- Days Cash on Hand: +50 days
- Cost of capital: 30yr MMD + credit spread
- Issuer, Issuer’s Counsel, Bond Counsel, Borrower’s Counsel, Real Estate Counsel, Underwriter’s Counsel, Trustee, Trustee’s Counsel, Feasibility Consultant, Appraiser, Auditor
- Governmental Process: Issuer application and TEFRA Process
- Financing Due Diligence: Form Indenture, PSA, legal documentation, Appendix A, Feasibility Study, other third-parties
- Mail Preliminary Official Statement
- Host investor presentations with Qualified Institutional Buyers
- Live Auction process on IPREO
- Borrower’s verbal award to approve auction pricing
- Finalize Official Statement
- DTC closing, process closing flow of funds through Trustee
- Post Quarterly covenant compliance on EMMA
- Post Annual Audits on EMMA